Students Count trustee slate faces scrutiny
“You have to ask, ‘What’s the agenda?’”
Calgary’s election campaign for public school trustees is getting unusually heated, with a contentious slate of candidates being challenged to reveal its financial and political backers before Election Day.
Five candidates are running under the Students Count banner, which has a five-point platform: fix math, fund classrooms not admin, fix report cards, ensure student wellness, and keep big money (unions and corporations) out of elections.
Unions and labour organizations have traditionally been the biggest contributors to trustee campaigns—particularly the Calgary & District Labour Council (CDLC). The CDLC gave more than $30,000 to trustee candidates in the 2013 election (cash and in-kind), and more than $11,500 to a single candidate, Julie Hrdlicka, in the 2015 byelection for Wards 11 & 13.
But while Students Count’s campaign materials say “special interests have no role in education,” its candidates are keeping their own donors under wraps even as other trustee hopefuls reveal theirs.
Althea Adams, who is running for the slate in Wards 3 & 4, said the Students Count candidates haven’t yet given much discussion to disclosing donors. “Because they are all individual donors, I don’t know if we’re going to or not,” she said.
Questions have long swirled around the political ties of Students Count, which received the blessing of UCP leadership hopeful Jason Kenney early on. Kelley Charlebois, a longtime provincial PC and former executive director for the since-merged party, has helped organize the group and do its PR.
The Sprawl reached out to the Kenney campaign requesting an interview. In an email, Blaise Boehmer, Kenney’s director of communications, said “Jason is not getting involved in the municipal campaign.”
Asked about Kenney on Sunday night, Adams dismissed any connection outright. “We’re not a Jason Kenney slate,” she said. “Whoever started that rumour — it’s laughable.”
Nimra Amjad, who is running against Adams in Wards 3 & 4, called Students Count a “political party” and said its refusal to disclose donors is revealing.
“Why would they want to hide that information?” said Amjad, who has posted a donor list to her website, albeit with mostly first names, last initials and no dollar amounts.
“I think there’s a concern about the election generally — that there are certain very wealthy individuals giving an amount of money that’s extraordinary, that no one else can compete with.”
“You have to ask, ‘What’s the agenda?’”
Hack is one of five public trustee candidates being endorsed by the CDLC, which is currently her largest donor, according to her website.
Adams said she decided to run because she’s a parent frustrated with the CBE’s direction, particularly regarding finances, with too much being spent at the board’s downtown HQ and not enough in classrooms.
The CBE has budgeted 78% of expenditures for classroom resources in 2017/18, including teacher pension contributions and specialized support staff. The remaining 22% is budgeted for areas such as programming support, maintenance, transportation and admin.
“Think about what we could do with that money,” said Adams. “We could get aides in classrooms to help out. We could buy more books. We could do so much stuff, and yet right now it’s stuck in the downtown corporate offices.”
For a political newbie like herself, the Students Count apparatus has been valuable, Adams said. “I didn’t have any idea how to run or how to do anything like that. So it’s fantastic, actually, to have this team. We can all work together. We’re kind of helping each other out.”
Trustees on the seven-member school board have traditionally voted independently of each other. Students Count candidates have said that if elected, they will vote together to enact change.
“In order to ensure these things get done, we actually need to have 4 out of 7 people elected,” said Lisa Davis, a former PC board member who’s running for Students Count in Wards 6 & 7. “We kept hearing this spring that parents were tired of electing one person who might have been a strong voice but wasn’t able to get anything done.”
“That’s why we came together as a group.”
Kim Tyers, who is running in Wards 3 & 4, said she’s concerned by the slate’s level of organization, and emphasized that independence is crucial for trustees.
“A trustee role is supposed to be a member of the community representing the children, and I fear that a lot of political influence is kind of seeping its way into this race,” Tyers said. “I want to really make sure that we’re keeping this non-partisan and independent.”